**I.** Some additional important theorems apply to functions that are continuous on a compact set (see §6).

Theorem (PageIndex{1})

If a function (f : A ightarrowleft(T, ho^{prime} ight), A subseteq(S, ho),) is relatively continuous on a compact set (B subseteq A,) then (f[B]) is a compact set in (left(T, ho^{prime} ight) .) Briefly,

[ ext{the continuous image of a compact set is compact.}]

**Proof**To show that (f[B]) is compact, we take any sequence (left{y_{m} ight} subseteq f[B]) and prove that it clusters at some (q in f[B]).

As (y_{m} in f[B], y_{m}=fleft(x_{m} ight)) for some (x_{m}) in (B .) We pick such an (x_{m} in B) for each (y_{m},) thus obtaining a sequence (left{x_{m} ight} subseteq B) with

[fleft(x_{m} ight)=y_{m}, quad m=1,2, ldots]

Now by the assumed compactness of (B,) the sequence (left{x_{m} ight}) must cluster at some (p in B .) Thus it has a subsequence (x_{m_{k}} ightarrow p .) As (p in B,) the function (f) is relatively continuous at (p) over (B) (by assumption). Hence by the sequential criterion ((§ 2), x_{m_{k}} ightarrow p) implies (fleft(x_{m_{k}} ight) ightarrow f(p) ;) i.e.,

[y_{m_{k}} ightarrow f(p) in f[B].]

Thus (q=f(p)) is the desired cluster point of (left{y_{m} ight} . square)

This theorem can be used to prove the compactness of various sets.

Example (PageIndex{1})

(1) A closed line segment (L[overline{a}, overline{b}]) in (E^{n}left(^{*} ext { and in other normed spaces } ight)) is compact, for, by definition,

[L[overline{a}, overline{b}]={overline{a}+t vec{u} | 0 leq t leq 1}, ext{ where } vec{u}=overline{b}-overline{a}.]

Thus (L[overline{a}, overline{b}]) is the image of the compact interval ([0,1] subseteq E^{1}) under the (operatorname{map} f : E^{1} ightarrow E^{n},) given by (f(t)=overline{a}+t vec{u},) which is continuous by Theorem 3 of §3. (Why?)

(2) The closed solid ellipsoid in (E^{3},)

[left{(x, y, z) | frac{x^{2}}{a^{2}}+frac{y^{2}}{b^{2}}+frac{z^{2}}{c^{2}} leq 1 ight},]

is compact, being the image of a compact globe under a suitable continuous map. The details are left to the reader as an exercise.

lemma (PageIndex{1})

Every nonvoid compact set (F subseteq E^{1}) has a maximum and a minimum.

**Proof**By Theorems 2 and 3 of §6, (F) is closed and bounded. Thus (F) has an infimum and a supremum in (E^{1}) (by the completeness axiom), say, (p=inf F) and (q=sup F .) It remains to show that (p, q in F .)

Assume the opposite, say, (q otin F .) Then by properties of suprema, each globe (G_{q}(delta)=(q-delta, q+delta)) contains some (x in B) (specifically, (q-delta

[(forall delta>0) quad F cap G_{ eg q}(delta) eq emptyset;]

i.e., (F) clusters at (q) and hence must contain (q) (being closed). However, since (q otin F,) this is the desired contradiction, and the lemma is proved. (square)

The next theorem has many important applications in analysis.

Theorem (PageIndex{2})

(Weierstrass).

(i) If a function (f : A ightarrowleft(T, ho^{prime} ight)) is relatively continuous on a compact set (B subseteq A,) then (f) is bounded on (B ;) i.e., (f[B]) is bounded.

(ii) If, in addition, (B eq emptyset) and (f) is real (left(f : A ightarrow E^{1} ight),) then (f[B]) has a maximum and a minimum; i.e., f attains a largest and a least value at some points of (B).

**Proof**Indeed, by Theorem (1, f[B]) is compact, so it is bounded, as claimed in ((i)).

If further (B eq emptyset) and (f) is real, then (f[B]) is a nonvoid compact set in (E^{1},) so by Lemma (1,) it has a maximum and a minimum in (E^{1} .) Thus all is proved. (square)

**Note 1.** This and the other theorems of this section hold, in particular, if (B) is a closed interval in (E^{n}) or a closed globe in (E^{n}left(^{*} ext { or } C^{n}
ight)) (because these sets are compact - see the examples in §6). This may fail, however, if (B) is not compact, e.g., if (B=(overline{a}, overline{b}) .) For a counterexample, see Problem 11 in Chapter 3, §13.

Theorem (PageIndex{3})

If a function (f : A ightarrowleft(T, ho^{prime} ight), A subseteq(S, ho)), is relatively continuous on a compact set (B subseteq A) and is one to one on (B) (i.e., when restricted to (B)), then its inverse, (f^{-1}), is continuout on (f[B]).

**Proof**To show that (f^{-1}) is continuous at each point (q in f[B]), we apply the sequential criterion (Theorem 1 in §2). Thus we fix a sequence (left{y_{m} ight} subseteq f[B], y_{m} ightarrow q in f[B]), and prove that (f^{-1}left(y_{m} ight) ightarrow f^{-1}(q)).

Let (f^{-1}left(y_{m} ight)=x_{m}) and (f^{-1}(q)=p) so that

[y_{m}=fleft(x_{m} ight), q=f(p), ext { and } x_{m}, p in B.]

We have to show that (x_{m} ightarrow p), i.e., that

[(forall varepsilon>0)(exists k)(forall m>k) quad holeft(x_{m}, p ight)

Seeking a contradiction, suppose this fails, i.e., its negation holds. Then (see Chapter 1, §§1–3) there is an (epsilon > 0) such that

[(forall k)left(exists m_{k}>k ight) quad holeft(x_{m_{k}}, p ight) geq varepsilon,]

where we write “(m_{k})” for “(m)” to stress that the (m_{k}) may be different for different (k). Thus by (1), we fix some (m_{k}) for each (k) so that (1) holds, choosing step by step,

[m_{k+1}>m_{k}, quad k=1,2, ldots]

Then the (x_{m_{k}}) form a subsequence of ({x_{m}}), and the corresponding (y_{m_{k}}=f(x_{m_{k}})) form a subsequence of (left{y_{m} ight}). Henceforth, for brevity, let (left{x_{m} ight}) and (left{y_{m} ight}) themselves denote these two subsequences. Then as before, (x_{m} in B, y_{m}=fleft(x_{m} ight) in f[B]), and (y_{m} ightarrow q, q=f(p)). Also,by(1),

[(forall m) quad holeft(x_{m}, p ight) geq varepsilonleft(x_{m} ext { stands for } x_{m_{k}} ight).]

Now as (left{x_{m} ight} subseteq B) and (B) is compact, (left{x_{m} ight}) has a (sub)subsequence

[x_{m_{i}} ightarrow p^{prime} ext { for some } p^{prime} in B.]

As (f) is relatively continuous on (B), this implies

[fleft(x_{m_{i}} ight)=y_{m_{i}} ightarrow fleft(p^{prime} ight)]

However, the subsequence (left{y_{m_{i}} ight}) must have the same limit as (left{y_{m} ight}), i.e., (f(p)). Thus (fleft(p^{prime} ight)=f(p)) whence (p=p^{prime}) (for (f) is one to one on (B)), so (x_{m_{i}} ightarrow p^{prime}=p).

This contradicts (2), however, and thus the proof is complete. (square)

Example (PageIndex{2})

(3) For a fixed (n in N,) define (f :[0,+infty) ightarrow E^{1}) by

[f(x)=x^{n}.]

Then (f) is one to one (strictly increasing) and continuous (being a monomial; see §3). Thus by Theorem 3, (f^{−1}) (the nth root function) is relatively continuous on each interval

[f=[a^{n}, b^{n}].]

hence on ([0,+infty).)

See also Example (a) in §6 and Problem 1 below.

**II. ****Uniform Continuity.** If (f) is relatively continuous on (B), then by definition,

[(forall varepsilon>0)(forall p in B)(exists delta>0)left(forall x in B cap G_{p}(delta)
ight) quad
ho^{prime}(f(x), f(p))

Here, in general, (delta) depends on both (epsilon) and (p) (see Problem 4 in §1); that is, given (epsilon > 0), some values of (delta) may fit a given p but fail (3) for other points.

It may occur, however, that one and the same (delta) (depending on (epsilon) only) satisfies (3) for all (p in B) simultaneously, so that we have the stronger formula

[(forall varepsilon>0)(exists delta>0)(forall p, x in B |
ho(x, p)

Definition

If (4) is true, we say that (f) is uniformly continuous on (B).

Clearly, this implies (3), but the converse fails.

Theorem (PageIndex{4})

If a function (f : A ightarrowleft(T, ho^{prime} ight), A subseteq(S, ho)), is relatively continuous on a compact set (B subset A), then (f) is also uniformly continuous on (B).

**Proof**(by contradiction). Suppose (f) is relatively continuous on (B), but (4) fails. Then there is an (epsilon > 0) such that

[(forall delta>0)(exists p, x in B) quad ho(x, p)

here (p) and (x) on (delta). We fix such an (epsilon) and let

[delta=1, frac{1}{2}, ldots, frac{1}{m}, dots]

Then for each (delta) (i.e., each (m)), we get two points (x_{m}, p_{m} in B) with

[ holeft(x_{m}, p_{m} ight)

and

[ ho^{prime}left(fleft(x_{m} ight), fleft(p_{m} ight) ight) geq varepsilon, quad m=1,2, ldots]

Thus we obtain two sequences, (left{x_{m} ight}) and (left{p_{m} ight}), in (B). As (B) is compact, (left{x_{m} ight}) has a subsequence (x_{m_{k}} ightarrow q(q in B)). For simplicity, let it be (left{x_{m} ight}) itself; thus

[x_{m} ightarrow q, quad q in B.]

Hence by (5), it easily follows that also (p_{m} ightarrow q) (because ( holeft(x_{m}, p_{m} ight) ightarrow 0). By the assumed relative continuity of (f) on (B), it follows that

[fleft(x_{m} ight) ightarrow f(q) ext { and } fleft(p_{m} ight) ightarrow f(q) ext { in }left(T, ho^{prime} ight).]

This, in turn, implies that ( ho^{prime}left(fleft(x_{m} ight), fleft(p_{m} ight) ight) ightarrow 0), which is impossible, in view of (6). This contradiction completes the proof. (square)

Example (PageIndex{1})

(a) A function (f : A ightarrow left( T , ho ^ { prime } ight) , A subseteq ( S , ho )), ic called a contraction map (on (A)) iff

[ ho ( x , y ) geq ho ^ { prime } ( f ( x ) , f ( y ) ) ext { for all } x , y in A.]

Any such map is uniformly continuous on A. In fact, given (varepsilon > 0), we simply take (delta = varepsilon). Then ( forall x , p in A )

[ ho ( x , p ) < delta ext { implies } ho ^ { prime } ( f ( x ) , f ( p ) ) leq ho ( x , p ) < delta = varepsilon,]

as required in (3).

(b) As a special case, consider the absolute value map (norm map) given by

[f ( overline { x } ) = | overline { x } | ext { on } E ^ { n } left( ^ { * } ext { or another normed space } ight).]

It is uniformly continuous on(E^{n}) because

[| | overline { x } | - | overline { p } | | leq | overline { x } - overline { p } | , ext { i.e., } ho ^ { prime } ( f ( overline { x } ) , f ( overline { p } ) ) leq ho ( overline { x } , overline { p } ),]

which shows that (f) is a contraction map, so Example (a) applies.

(c) Other examples of contraction maps are

(1) constant maps (see §1, Example (a)) and

(2) projection maps (see the proof of Theorem 3 in §3).

Verify!

(d) Define (f : E ^ { 1 } ightarrow E ^ { 1 }) by

[f ( x ) = sin x]

By elementary trigonometry, (| sin x | leq | x |). Thus (left( forall x , p in E ^ { 1 } ight))

[egin{aligned} | f ( x ) - f ( p ) | & = | sin x - sin p | & = 2 left| sin frac { 1 } { 2 } ( x - p ) cdot cos frac { 1 } { 2 } ( x + p ) ight| & leq 2 left| sin frac { 1 } { 2 } ( x - p ) ight| & leq 2 cdot frac { 1 } { 2 } | x - p | = | x - p | end{aligned},]

and (f) is a contraction map again. Hence the sine function is uniformly continuous on (E^{1}); similarly for the cosine function.

(e) Given ( emptyset eq A subseteq ( S , ho ) , ) define ( f : S ightarrow E ^ { 1 } ) by

[

f ( x ) =
ho ( x , A ) ext { where }
ho ( x , A ) = inf _ { y in A }
ho ( x , y )

]

It is easy to show that

[

( forall x , p in S ) quad
ho ( x , A ) leq
ho ( x , p ) +
ho ( p , A )

]

i.e.,

[

f ( x ) leq
ho ( p , x ) + f ( p ) , ext { or } f ( x ) - f ( p ) leq
ho ( p , x )

]

Similarly, ( f ( p ) - f ( x ) leq ho ( p , x ) . ) Thus

[

| f ( x ) - f ( p ) | leq
ho ( p , x )

]

i.e., ( f ) is uniformly continuous (being a contraction map).

(f) The identity map ( f : ( S , ho ) ightarrow ( S , ho ) , ) given by

[

f ( x ) = x

]

is uniformly continuous on ( S ) since

[

ho ( f ( x ) , f ( p ) ) =
ho ( x , p ) ext { (a contraction map!) }

]

However, even relative continuity could fail if the metric in the domain space ( S ) were not the same as in ( S ) when regarded as the range space (e.g., make ( ho ^ { prime } ) discrete!)

(g) Define ( f : E ^ { 1 } ightarrow E ^ { 1 } ) by

[

f ( x ) = a + b x quad ( b
eq 0 ).

]

Then

[

left( forall x , p in E ^ { 1 }
ight) quad | f ( x ) - f ( p ) | = | b | | x - p |;

]

i.e.,

[

ho ( f ( x ) , f ( p ) ) = | b |
ho ( x , p ).

]

Thus, given ( varepsilon > 0 , ) take ( delta = varepsilon / | b | . ) Then

[

ho ( x , p ) < delta Longrightarrow
ho ( f ( x ) , f ( p ) ) = | b |
ho ( x , p ) < | b | delta = varepsilon,

]

proving uniform continuity.

(h) Let

[

f ( x ) = frac { 1 } { x } quad ext { on } B = ( 0 , + infty ).

]

Then ( f ) is continuous on ( B , ) but not uniformly so. Indeed, we can prove the negation of ( ( 4 ) , ) i.e.

[

( exists varepsilon > 0 ) ( forall delta > 0 ) ( exists x , p in B ) quad
ho ( x , p ) < delta ext { and }
ho ^ { prime } ( f ( x ) , f ( p ) ) geq varepsilon.

]

Take ( varepsilon = 1 ) and any( delta > 0 . ) We look for ( x , p ) such that

[

| x - p | < delta ext { and } | f ( x ) - f ( p ) | geq varepsilon,

]

i.e.,

[

left| frac { 1 } { x } - frac { 1 } { p }
ight| geq 1,

]

This is achieved by taking

[

p = min left( delta , frac { 1 } { 2 }
ight) , x = frac { p } { 2 } . quad ( ext { Verify! } )

]

Thus ( ( 4 ) ) fails on ( B = ( 0 , + infty ) , ) yet it holds on ( [ a , + infty ) ) for any ( a > 0 ) .

(Verify!)

## Topology Spring 2020

The content of the first-year courses in the Bachelor program in Mathematics. In particular, each student is expected to be familiar with notion of continuity for functions from/to Euclidean spaces, and with the content of the corresponding basic theorems (Bolzano, Weierstrass etc..). In addition, some degree of scientific maturity in writing rigorous proofs (and following them when presented in class) is absolutely essential.

### Content

An introduction to topology i.e. the domain of mathematics that studies how to define the notion of continuity on a mathematical structure, and how to use it to study and classify these structures.

Topics covered include: Topological and metric spaces, continuity, connectedness, compactness, product spaces, separation axioms, quotient spaces, homotopy, fundamental group, covering spaces.

## Textbook Contents

1. Scope of Toxicology

2. Risk Assessment

3. Targets and Bio-Transformation

4. Toxicokinetics

5. Hemato- and Vascular Toxicity

6. Dermatotoxicity

7. Neurotoxicity

8. Hepatotoxicity

9. Nephrotoxicity

10. Techniques In Vivo & In Vitro

11 . Pulmonary Toxicity

12. Reproductive Toxicity

13. Geno toxicity

14. Carcinogenicity

*Photo Source: (CC BY-SA 2.5 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hep_G2#mediaviewer/File:HepG2.jpg)

Aubin, T.: Équations du type Monge-Ampère sur les variétés kählériennes compactes. Bull. Sci. Math. (2) **102**(1), 63–95 (1978)

Brînzănescu, V.: Néron-Severi group for nonalgebraic elliptic surfaces. II. Non-Kählerian case. Manuscr. Math. **84**(3–4), 415–420 (1994)

Cao, H.D.: Deformation of Kähler metrics to Kähler-Einstein metrics on compact Kähler manifolds. Invent. Math. **81**(2), 359–372 (1985)

Cherrier, P.: Équations de Monge-Ampère sur les variétés Hermitiennes compactes. Bull. Sci. Math. (2) **111**, 343–385 (1987)

Evans, L.C.: Classical solutions of fully nonlinear, convex, second order elliptic equations. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. **25**, 333–363 (1982)

Fong, F.T.-H., Zhang, Z.: The collapsing rate of the Kähler-Ricci flow with regular infinite time singularity. J. Reine Angew. Math. **703**, 95–113 (2015)

Fu, X., Guo, B., Song, J.: Geometric estimates for complex Monge-Ampère equations. Preprint. arXiv:1706.01527

Gauduchon, P.: Le théorème de l’excentricité nulle. C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. A-B **285**(5), A387–A390 (1977)

Gill, M.: Convergence of the parabolic complex Monge-Ampère equation on compact Hermitian manifolds. Commun. Anal. Geom. **19**(2), 277–303 (2011)

Gill, M.: Collapsing of products along the Kähler-Ricci flow. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. **366**(7), 3907–3924 (2014)

Gross, M., Tosatti, V., Zhang, Y.: Collapsing of abelian fibred Calabi-Yau manifolds. Duke Math. J. **162**(3), 517–551 (2013)

Krylov, N.V.: Boundedly nonhomogeneous elliptic and parabolic equations. Izvestia Akad. Nauk. SSSR **46**, 487–523 (1982). English translation in. Math. USSR Izv. **20**(3), 459–492 (1983)

La Nave, G., Tian, G.: A continuity method to construct canonical metrics. Math. Ann. **365**(3–4), 911–921 (2016)

La Nave, G., Tian, G., Zhang, Z.: Bounding diameter of singular Kähler metric. Am. J. Math. **139**(6), 1693–1731 (2017)

Li, Y.: Bounding diameter of conical Kähler metric. J. Geom. Anal. **28**(2), 950–982 (2018)

Phong, D.H., Sturm, J.: The Dirichlet problem for degenerate complex Monge-Ampère equations. Commun. Anal. Geom. **18**(1), 145–170 (2010)

Rubinstein, Y.A.: Some discretizations of geometric evolution equations and the Ricci iteration on the space of Kähler metrics. Adv. Math. **218**(5), 1526–1565 (2008)

Sherman, M., Weinkove, B.: Local Calabi and curvature estimates for the Chern-Ricci flow. New York J. Math. **19**, 565–582 (2013)

Song, J., Tian, G.: The Kähler-Ricci flow on surfaces of positive Kodaira dimension. Invent. Math. **170**(3), 609–653 (2007)

Song, J., Tian, G.: The Kähler-Ricci flow through singularities. Invent. Math. **207**(2), 519–595 (2017)

Song, J., Weinkove, B.: An introduction to the Kähler-Ricci flow. In: An Introduction to the Kähler-Ricci Flow. Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 2086, pp. 89–188. Springer, Cham (2013)

Tian, G., Zhang, Z.: On the Kähler-Ricci flow on projective manifolds of general type. Chin. Ann. Math. Ser. B **27**(2), 179–192 (2006)

Tian, G., Zhang, Z.: Relative volume comparison of Ricci flow and its applications. Preprint. arXiv:1802.09506

Tosatti, V.: Adiabatic limits of Ricci-flat Kähler metrics. J. Differ. Geom. **84**(2), 427–453 (2010)

Tosatti, V., Wang, Y., Weinkove, B., Yang, X.: (C^<2,alpha >) estimates for nonlinear elliptic equations in complex and almost complex geometry. Calc. Var. Partial Differ. Equ. **54**(1), 431–453 (2015)

Tosatti, V., Weinkove, B.: Estimates for the complex Monge-Ampère equation on Hermitian and balanced manifolds. Asian J. Math. **14**(1), 19–40 (2010)

Tosatti, V., Weinkove, B.: The complex Monge-Ampère equation on compact Hermitian manifolds. J. Am. Math. Soc. **23**(4), 1187–1195 (2010)

Tosatti, V., Weinkove, B.: On the evolution of a Hermitian metric by its Chern-Ricci form. J. Differ. Geom. **99**(1), 125–163 (2015)

Tosatti, V., Weinkove, B.: The Chern-Ricci flow on complex surfaces. Compos. Math. **149**(12), 2101–2138 (2013)

Tosatti, V., Weinkove, B., Yang, X.: Collapsing of the Chern-Ricci flow on elliptic surfaces. Math. Ann. **362**(3–4), 1223–1271 (2015)

Trudinger, N.S.: Fully nonlinear, uniformly elliptic equations under natural structure conditions. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. **278**(2), 751–769 (1983)

Tsuji, H.: Existence and degeneration of Kähler-Einstein metrics on minimal algebraic varieties of general type. Math. Ann. **281**(1), 123–133 (1988)

Tsuji, H.: Degenerate Monge-Ampère equation in algebraic geometry. In: Miniconference on Analysis and Applications (Brisbane, 1993). Proceedings of the Centre for Mathematics and its Applications, Australian National University, vol. 33, pp. 209–224. Australian National University, Canberra (1994)

Wall, C.T.C.: Geometric structures on compact complex analytic surfaces. Topology **25**(2), 119–153 (1986)

Yau, S.-T.: On the Ricci curvature of a compact Kähler manifold and the complex Monge-Ampère equation, I. Commun. Pure Appl. Math. **31**, 339–411 (1978)

Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z.: The continuity method on minimal elliptic Kähler surfaces. Preprint. arXiv:1610.07806

Zhang, Y., Zhang, Z.: The continuity method on Fano fibrations. Preprint. arXiv:1612.01348

## ►Feher,"Introduction to Digital Logic" with Laboratory Exercises (2010)

James Feher,”Introduction to Digital Logic” with Laboratory Exercises (2010)

This lab manual provides an introduction to digital logic, starting with simple gates and building up to state machines. Students should have a solid understanding of algebra as well as a rudimentary understanding of basic electricity including voltage, current, resistance, capacitance, inductance and how they relate to direct current circuits.

Buy Print Format **$23.49** (99 pages, B&W)

Download Free PDF (100 pages, color , 3.2 Mb)

## ►TBQ Editors, "College Biology" Volume 3 of 3 (2014)

**“College Biology”****Volume 3 of 3**

**Chapters 33 – 47** *“**Animal Structure and Function”* through *“Preserving Biodiversity”*

Buy Print Version USD $39.00 (paperback, grayscale***, 556 pages) via Lulu.com

ISBN: 978-1-312-40299-7

Free: Volume 3 Download PDF Full color, 556 pages, 101 MB

### Contents Volume 3

Chapter 33: The Animal Body: Basic Form and Function

Chapter 34: Animal Nutrition and the Digestive System

Chapter 35: The Nervous System

Chapter 36: Sensory Systems

Chapter 37: The Endocrine System

Chapter 38: The Musculoskeletal System

Chapter 39: The Respiratory System

Chapter 40: The Circulatory System

Chapter 41: Osmotic Regulation and Excretion

Chapter 42: The Immune System

Chapter 43: Animal Reproduction and Development

Chapter 44: Ecology and the Biosphere

Chapter 45: Population and Community Ecology

Chapter 46: Ecosystems

Chapter 47: Conservation Biology and Biodiversity **Plus** Chapter summaries, Review questions, Critical thinking questions, Answer keys, Key terms by chapter, Embedded supplemental learning links.

Buy Print Version USD $39.20 (paperback, grayscale, 556 pages) Lulu.com ISBN: 978-1-312-40299-7

## Terminology and some auxiliary results

### Notation

All topological spaces under consideration are assumed to be Tikhonov.

We say that a family (mathcal __) of sets has order (le n) if every subfamily (mathcal subset mathcal ) of cardinality (n+2) has an empty intersection (in other terminology, the family (mathcal ) is point- ((n+1)) ). The family (mathcal ) has finite order if it has order (le n) for some (nin omega ) .__

__
__

The family (mathcal __) of subsets of a space X is (T_0) -separating if, for every pair of distinct points x, y of X, there is (Uin mathcal ) containing exactly one of the points x, y.__

__ __

__For a locally compact space X, (alpha (X)) denotes the one point compactification of X. We denote the point at infinity of this compactification by (infty _X) .__

### Function spaces

Given a compact space *K*, by *C*(*K*) we denote the Banach space of continuous real-valued functions on *K*, equipped with the standard supremum norm.

### Scattered spaces

A space *X* is *scattered* if no nonempty subset (Asubseteq X) is dense-in-itself.

For a scattered space *K*, by *Cantor–Bendixson height* *ht*(*X*) of *K* we mean the minimal ordinal (alpha ) such that the Cantor–Bendixson derivative (K^<(alpha )>) of the space *K* is empty. The Cantor–Bendixson height of a compact scattered space is always a nonlimit ordinal.

A surjective map (f:X
ightarrow Y) between topological spaces is said to be *irreducible* if no proper closed subset of *X* maps onto *Y*. If *X* is compact, by Kuratowski–Zorn Lemma, for any surjective map (f:X
ightarrow Y) , there is a closed subset (Csubseteq X) such that the restriction (fupharpoonright C) is irreducible.

The following facts concerning continuous maps of scattered compact spaces are well known, cf. the proof of Proposition 8.5.3 and Exercise 8.5.10(C) in [16].

### Proposition 2.1

Let *K* be a scattered compact space and let (varphi : K
ightarrow L) be a continuous surjection. Then, for each ordinal (alpha ) , we have (L^ <(alpha )>subseteq varphi (K^<(alpha )>)) . In particular, (ht(L) le ht(K)) .

### Proposition 2.2

Let *K* be a scattered compact space and let (varphi : K
ightarrow L) be a continuous irreducible surjection. Then (L' = varphi (K')) and (varphi upharpoonright (K

### Eberlein and Corson compact spaces

A space *K* is an *Eberlein* compact space if *K* is homeomorphic to a weakly compact subset of a Banach space. Equivalently, a compact space *K* is an Eberlein compactum if *K* can be embedded in the following subspace of the product (mathbb

If *K* is homeomorphic to a weakly compact subset of a Hilbert space, then we say that *K* is a *uniform Eberlein* compact space. All metrizable compacta are uniform Eberlein.

A compact space *K* is *Corson compact* if, for some set (Gamma ) , *K* is homeomorphic to a subset of the (Sigma ) -product of real lines

Clearly, the class of Corson compact spaces contains all Eberlein compacta.

### Spaces (sigma _(X))

Given a set (Gamma ) and (nin omega ) , by (sigma _

For (Ain [Gamma ]^

To simplify the notation we will say that a compact space *K* belongs to the class (mathcal *K* can be embedded in the space (sigma _*K* belongs to any of the above classes, then each closed subset of *K* is also in the same class. One can also easily verify that the class (mathcal

### Proposition 2.3

For a compact space *K* and (nin omega ) , the following conditions are equivalent:

*K* has a (T_0) -separating point-*n* family of clopen subsets

*K* belongs to the class (mathcal

### Proof

((ii) (Rightarrow ) (i)) Suppose that *K* is a subspace of the space (sigma _*n* family of clopen subsets of *K*. (square )

### Lemma 2.4

Let *K* be an infinite compact subset of (sigma _*K* can can be embedded into (sigma _*w*(*K*) of *K*.

### Proof

Follows from the proof of Lemma 2.3 and the well known fact that, for an infinite compact space the cardinality of the family of clopen subsets of *K* is bounded by *w*(*K*). (square )

### Lemma 2.5

Let (Gamma ) be an infinite set. Then for any (n,kin omega , kge 1) , the discrete union of *k* copies of (sigma _

### Proof

Let (X=

One can easily verify that, if we assign to a function *f* from *i*-th copy of (sigma _*k* copies of (sigma _

### Theorem 2.6

(Argyros and Godefroy) Every Eberlein compactum *K* of weight (<omega _omega ) and of finite height belongs to the class (mathcal

### Example 2.7

(Bell and Marciszewski [4]) There exists an Eberlein compactum *K* of weight (omega _omega ) and height 3 which does not belong to (mathcal

### Luzin sets and its variants

Usually, a subset *L* of real line (mathbb *Luzin set* if *X* is uncountable and, for every meager subset *A* of (mathbb *L* of a Polish space *X* is a ((lambda ,kappa )) *-Luzin set* if *X* has the cardinality (lambda ) , and, for every meager subset *A* of *X* the intersection (Acap L) has the cardinality less than (kappa ) . In this terminology, the existence of a Luzin set in (mathbb

Since, for every Polish space *X* without isolated points there is a Borel isomorphism (h:X
ightarrow mathbb *h*(*A*) is meager in (mathbb *X* is equivalent to the existence of a ((lambda ,kappa )) -Luzin set in (mathbb

It is known that, for each (nge 1) the existence of a ( (omega _n,omega _1)) -Luzin set in (mathbb

### Cardinal numbers (mathfrak ) and (mathrm (mathcal ))

Recall that the preorder (le ^*) on (omega ^omega ) is defined by (fle ^* g) if (f(n)le g(n)) for all but finitely (nin omega ) . A subset *A* of (omega ^omega ) is called *unbounded* if it is unbounded with respect to this preorder. In Sect. 4, we will use two cardinal numbers related with the structure of the real line

It is well known that (mathfrak **le mathrm (mathcal **

**= omega _n) is consistent with ZFC , (cf. [17, Theorem 5.1]).**

** **

**Aleksandrov duplicate AD(K) of a compact space K**

**Aleksandrov duplicate AD(K) of a compact space K**

Recall the construction of the Aleksandrov duplicate *AD*(*K*) of a compact space *K*.

(AD(K) = K imes 2) , points (*x*, 1), for (xin K) , are isolated in *AD*(*K*) and basic neighborhoods of a point (*x*, 0) have the form ((U imes 2) *U* is an open neighborhood of *x* in *K*.

The following fact is well known (cf. [10]).

### Proposition 2.8

The Aleksandrov duplicate *AD*(*K*) of an (uniform) Eberlein compact space *K* is (uniform) Eberlein compact.

### Proof

Without loss of generality we can assume that *K* is a subspace of (c_0(Gamma )) ( (ell _2(Gamma )) ), equipped with the pointwise topology, for some set (Gamma ) . We will show that *AD*(*K*) can be embedded into the space (c_0(Gamma cup K)) ( (ell _2(Gamma cup K)) ). For (xin K) and (i=0,1) define a function (f_

One can easily verify that the mapping ((x,i)mapsto f_

## Panjab University M.Sc. Mathematics 2020-21 Syllabi : puchd.ac.in

** (ii) Sequences and series**: Convergent sequences (in metric spaces). Subsequences. Cauchy sequences. Upper and lower limits of a sequence of real numbers. Riemann’s Theorem on Rearrangements of series of real and complex numbers.

** (iii) Continuity**: Limits of functions (in metric spaces). Continuous functions. Continuity and compactness. Continuity and connectedness. Monotonic functions.

** Unit- II**:

**: Definition and existence of the Riemann-Stieltjes integral. Properties of the integral. Integration of vector-valued functions. Rectifiable curves.**

__(iv) The Riemann-Stieltjes integral__** (v) Sequences and series of functions**: Problem of interchange of limit processes for sequences of functions. Uniform convergence. Uniform convergence and continuity. Uniform convergence and integration. Uniform convergence and differentiation. Equicontinuous families of functions, The Stone- Weierstrass theorem.

** Math 602S**:

**Algebra- I**

**:**

__Unit- I__Review of basic concepts of groups with emphasis on exercises. Permutation groups, Even and odd permutations, Conjugacy classes of permutations, Alternating groups, Simplicity of An, n > 4. Cayley’s Theorem, Direct products, Fundamental Theorem for finite abelian groups, Sylow theorems and their applications, Finite Simple groups [Scope as in chapters 2-4 Modern Algebra by Surjeet Singh and Qazi Zameerudin, Eighth Edition and chapters 11, 24, 25 of Contemporary Abstract Algebra by Gallian, Fourth Edition]

** Unit-II**:

Survey of some finite groups, Groups of order p2, pq (p and q primes). Solvable groups, Normal and subnormal series, composition series, the theorems of Schreier and Jordan Holder [Scope as in Chapters 6 of Modern Algebra by Surjeet Singh and Qazi Zameerudin, Eighth Edition and Chapter 7 of Algebra, Vol. I by Luther and Passi].

Review of basic concepts of rings with emphasis on exercises. Polynomial rings, formal power series rings, matrix rings, the ring of Guassian Integers. [Scope as in Chapters 7, 8 and 9 of Modern Algebra by Surjeet Singh and Qazi Zameerudin, Eighth Edition , 2006].

** Math 603S**:

**Differential Equations**

** Unit-I**:

Differential Equations Existence and uniqueness of solution of first order equations. Boundary value problems and Strum-Liouville theory. ODE in more than 2-variables. [Scope as in Chapter V of the book ‘An introduction to Ordinary Differential Equations’ by E.A.Coddington and Chapters X & XI of the book ‘Elementary Differential Equations and Boundary Value Problems’ by W.E.Boyce and R.C.Diprima.]

** Unit-II**:

Partial differential equations of first order. Partial differential equations of higher order with constant coefficients. Partial differential equations of second order and their classification. [Scope as in Chapters I, II & III of the book ‘Elements of Partial Differential Equations’ by I.N.Sneddon].

** Math 604S**:

**Complex Analysis-I**

**:**

__Unit-I__Complex plane, geometric representation of complex numbers, joint equation of circle and straight line, stereographic projection and the spherical representation of the extended complex plane. Topology on the complex plane, connected and simply connected sets. Complex valued functions and their continuity. Curves, connectivity through polygonal lines.Analytic functions, Cauchy-Riemann equations, Harmonic functions and Harmonic conjugates.Power series, exponential and trigonometric functions, arg z, log z, az and their continuous branches. (Scope as in “Foundations of Complex Analysis” by Ponnusamy S., Chapter 1, (§1.1-§ 1.5),Chapter 2 (§ 2.2, §2.3), Chapter 3, (§3.1-§3.5), Chapter 4, (§4.9).)

** Unit-II**:

Complex Integration, line integral, Cauchy’s theorem for a rectangle, Cauchy’s theorem in a disc, index of a point with respect to a closed curve, Cauchy’s integral formula, Higher derivatives, Morrera’s theorem, Liouville’s theorem, fundamental theorem of Algebra. The general form of Cauchy’s theorem. (Scope as in “Foundations of Complex Analysis” by Ponnusamy S., Chapter 4, (§4.1-§ 4.8), Chapter 6 (§ 6.4, §6.6).”Complex Analysis” by L/ V. Ahlfors, Chapter 4 (§1, 2, 4.1 to 4.5and §5.1)

## Duality

I have already said that, given a set *X* with a quasi-uniformity ** U**, seen with the induced topology, every compact saturated subset of

*X*is closed in

*X*–1 . This means that the cocompact topology on

*X*is coarser than the topology of

*X*–1 . When

**is**

*U*

*U*_{0}, the minimal compatible quasi-uniformity (see Proposition D), those two topologies

*coincide*, as we now argue.

**Proposition F.** Let *X* be a locally compact topological space, and ** U** be the minimal compatible quasi-uniformity

*U*_{0}. The topology induced by the dual quasi-uniformity

*–1 on*

**U***X*coincides with the cocompact topology.

We expand the definition of *R*: *R* –1 [*x*] is the set of points *y* such that for every *i*, if *y* ∈ *Q*_{i} then *x* ∈ *U*_{i} equivalently, such that for every *i*, if *x* ∉ *U*_{i} then *x* ∉ *Q*_{i} in other words, it is the complement of *Q*_{I}, where *Q*_{I} is the union of the sets *Q*_{i}, *i* ∈ *I*, and *I* is the collection of indices *i* such that *x* ∉ *U*_{i}. *Q*_{I} is compact saturated, so its complement *R* –1 [*x*] is open in the cocompact topology. This complement contains *x* (*R* –1 [*x*] always contains *x*), and is included in *O*. This shows that *O* is an open neighborhood, in the cocompact topology, of each of its points, so that *O* is open in the cocompact topology.

Conversely, let *O* be any open subset of *X* in the cocompact topology. Its complement *Q* is compact saturated in *X*. By Lemma C, *O* is open in the topology induced by * U* –1 . ☐

We finally reach the result promised at the beginning of this post.

**Theorem.** Let *X* be a stably compact topological space. There is a unique quasi-uniformity ** U** that induces the topology of

*X*and such that the dual quasi-uniformity

*–1 induces the cocompact topology, and this is the minimal compatible quasi-uniformity*

**U**

*U*_{0}.

*Proof.* Existence is by Proposition F. In order to show uniqueness, we fix a quasi-uniformity ** U** that induces the topology of

*X*and such that the dual quasi-uniformity

*–1 induces the cocompact topology. By Proposition D’,*

**U****contains**

*U*

*U*_{0}, so we concentrate on showing the reverse inclusion.

Let *R* be any entourage of ** U**. There is an entourage

*S*in

**such that**

*U**S*o

*S*⊆

*R*. For every

*x*∈

*X*, it follows that

*S*–1 [

*x*] ×

*S*[

*x*] is included in

*R*: every pair (

*y*,

*z*) in

*S*–1 [

*x*] ×

*S*[

*x*] is such that (

*y*,

*x*) ∈

*S*and (

*x*,

*z*) ∈

*S*, so (

*y*,

*z*) ∈

*R*.

*S*–1 [

*x*] is an open neighborhood of

*x*in

*X*d since

*–1 induces the cocompact topology on*

**U***X*, and

*S*[

*x*] is an open neighborhood of

*x*in

*X*since

**induces the original topology on**

*U**X*. Therefore

*R*is an open neighborhood of (

*x*,

*x*) in

*X*d ×

*X*, for every

*x*∈

*X*. In other words,

*R*is an open neighborhood of (=) in

*. By Proposition E’,*

*X*d ×*X**R*in

*U*_{0}, and this finishes the proof. ☐

## Custom T-shirts

### Custom Personalized T-shirts - 41 Items Found

Gildan® Adult Heavy Cotton™ T-Shirt -White (Q822711)

Gildan® Adult Ultra Cotton® T-Shirt - White (Q132711)

Gildan® Adult Heavy Cotton™ T-Shirt - Colors (Q922711)

Gildan® DryBlend® T-Shirt - White (Q532711)

Gildan® Ladies' Heavy Cotton™ T-Shirt - White (Q442711)

4.5 Oz Gildan® Softstyle® Semi-Fitted Adult T-Shirt - White (Q180611)

4.5 Oz Gildan® Softstyle® Semi-Fitted Adult T-Shirt -Colored (Q280611)

Fruit of the Loom Youth 5 oz. 100% Heavy Cotton HD® T-Shirt (Q35437)

Gildan® Adult Ultra Cotton® T-Shirt - Colors (Q232711)

Gildan® Softstyle® T-Shirt -White (Q332711)

Gildan® Ladies' Ultra Cotton® T-Shirt - White (Q642711)

Gildan® Softstyle® T-Shirt - Colors (Q432711)

Gildan® DryBlend® T-Shirt - Colors (Q632711)

Hanes® - EcoSmart® Cotton/Poly T-Shirt (Q45794)

Gildan® Ladies' Heavy Cotton™ T-Shirt - Colors (Q542711)

Gildan® Softstyle® Ladies' T-Shirt - White (Q552711)

Port & Company® Youth Essential Cotton Tee's (6.1 oz.) (Q331411)

Gildan® Ladies' Ultra Cotton® T-Shirt - Colors (Q742711)

Gildan Ultra Cotton® T-Shirts (6 oz.) (Q200311)

Port & Company® Cotton/Poly Core Blend Tee's (5.5oz.) (Q711411)

### See what our customers think of QualityImprint

- Mary Adams says
*"Customer service was very efficient & diligent in returning emails with answers I was very happy with their service & thank you all. "* - Dorothy Ivanoff says
*"Very fast service and very friendly :)"* - William Foster says
*"Quick and accurate responses to all email questions and orders. No need to constantly circle back for confirmations or answers. One and Done! Always courteous and friendly."*

### Buy T-shirts Imprinted with your Logo Custom Personalized at QualityImprint!

**Quality Printed T-shirts with your Logo**

The classic branded t-shirt is a time-tested way of displaying logos and showing support for meaningful brands. Consider the purchase of t-shirts with logo from QualityImprint to showcase your company or cause to the world. We offer a wide spectrum of colors and styles to choose from, making it easy to find the right quality imprinted t-shirts for your company.

**Why Advertise with T-shirts**?

Custom t-shirts provide businesses with an affordable advertising medium. With the costly nature of traditional advertising mediums, personalized t-shirts will not break your bank. They only require a minimal investment on your part. They cost less than what you will spend on billboards or newspaper advertisements.

Imprinted t-shirts are effective as an advertising medium. They will be used by people of all ages. You can hand out quality imprinted t-shirts to organizations who can in turn use it as a company uniform. Customized t-shirts are also ideal souvenirs during fundraising campaigns or when promoting a cause. T-shirts are the perfect corporate event giveaway or tradeshow freebie.

**Benefits of Marketing with T-Shirts**

Logo imprinted t-shirts will serve as a walking advertisement that will promote your brand to potential customers. They will be used on a daily basis so you can look forward to continuous publicity of your brand. They will be worn by employees as part of their company uniform thus increasing the visibility of your brand. Whenever people wear **t-shirts with logo**, they will see your logo and easily remember it. They offer an affordable advertising medium saving you thousands of dollars. The money you will save can be allocated to other aspects of your business.

**Beef It Up with Your Logo**

Custom printed t-shirts can be customized according to your marketing specifications. There is a bevy of options to choose from as far as this apparel is concerned. Don’t have a logo yet? Our design team can help design the perfect logo that will help beef up your branding. Just tell us what you need and we will do the rest.

With **quality imprinted t-shirts**, It is understandable if you will have second thoughts to purchase them due to quality issues. At QualityImprint, you can have the peace of mind that the piece of apparel you are buying is of top quality. Our custom printed t-shirts are made from durable materials so you can bank on wearing them for a long time. Our quality assurance also boils down to the kind of services we provide. When ordering t-shirts from us, expect to receive the highest quality customer service. See for yourself why we received 5-stasr rating for customer service in TrustPilot. Our ultimate goal is to ensure your 100% satisfaction.

At QualityImprint, we employ a team of designers to create a professional look for your logo and branded message. Our designers work hard to ensure that the colors are vibrant, your logo looks just right and the text is easy to read at a distance. These shirts will help you to stand out to potential customers and clients and serve as apparel worthy of wearing in support of your brand.

In the age of social media, it’s easy for businesses to get lost in the online crowd. A quality made t-shirt is in-person branding your employees and customers will recognize and appreciate. Clients ordering QualityImprint t-shirts with logo know they’re getting great quality products for great prices.

Ordering from us is fast and relatively straightforward. We offer free quotes, samples, and mock-ups for your approval before being finalized. We give importance to meeting deadlines so look forward to on-time shipment of your order. We offer a wide selection of promotional t-shirts so you can choose the brand that will truly represent your brand to potential customers.

Order our quality imprinted t-shirts for fashionable branding made to last. We pride ourselves on outstanding customer service and fast shipping times. Call us today at 888-377-9339 for a quote, more information, and free product samples. In a tough industry, you need to bring your product in front of the crowd. You simply cannot go wrong with printed t-shirts.

On-Time Shipment

Meeting deadlines is important to us so we are serious in delivering your order on time.

Personalized Service

We guarantee quality not only in our promotional products but our service as well. A capable account manager is assigned to each customer for a seamless and excellent experience.

Satisfaction Guaranteed

We guarantee that your order will have the correct promotional product, imprint and will be delivered on time. If those are not met, we will redo your order.